Angel Heart

Average Rating: 3 stars out of 5.
Angel Heart
A down on his luck detective travels from the tough streets of Brooklyn, to the hot jazz clubs of New Orleans, and finally to voodoo rituals in the swamps of Louisiana.


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Jul 28, 2014
  • lukasevansherman rated this: 2 stars out of 5.

Yeah, this voodoo noir is pretty bad. Mickey Rourke did used to be a pretty good looking dude (what happened?) and had a certain sleazy, brooding charm, but he also projected an arrogance that didn't match his modest talent. At the time, this received attention for the graphic sex scene between him and Lisa Bonet, who was still on the very wholesome "Cosby Show." To show you how obvious this movie is, Rourke's private dick character is named Angel and Robert De Niro's is named Louis Cyphre (get it? Lucifer!). De Niro is creepy and understated, but also seems understandably bored with the movie's slow pace and convoluted (but not interesting) plot. Rourke seemed to like steamy sex and was also in "9 1/2 Weeks" and "Wild Orchid." Also see the remake of "Cat People," "The Serpent and the Rainbow," and "The Big Easy."

Apr 15, 2014
  • Bazooka_Joe rated this: 1.5 stars out of 5.

I certainly view Angel Heart as being director Alan Parker's statement about his deep-rooted hatred for blacks. I mean, Parker certainly went well out of his way to emphasize racism in this picture and make blacks out to be the stupidest, most gullible, voodoo-loving idiots imaginable._____ Angel Heart is definitely one of those frustratingly confused and convoluted stories that (in all of its demented confusion) gives away its surprise, twist ending far too early in the story._____ And, once again, I'm absolutely baffled about what brought actor Mickey Rourke his vast popularity in the movies of the 1980s. He sure didn't have a likable screen-presence nor did he have any noteworthy talent to speak of. I just don't get it._____ Yeah. OK. I will admit that Angel Heart did contain some very striking imagery, at times, and the fairly explicit sex scene that took place between the Epiphany and Angel characters was quite startling to behold, but, with that said, this film was a certified limp-dick as far as its "noir" aspect was concerned. And, yes, it certainly fell flat on its face when it came to the impact of its horror element, as well.

May 03, 2013

Great movie. Mood piece. No idea why the low ratings from some. If you don't like the genre don't watch it.

Apr 29, 2013
  • RobertLR rated this: 1 stars out of 5.

Yes one of De Niro's worst movies

Dec 17, 2012

I think that this is an excellent movie. There are a couple of inconsistencies but if I ignore them I can enjoy the movie. Yes it is graphic and bizarre and difficult to understand. That is why I like it.

Dec 17, 2012
  • Monolith rated this: 1.5 stars out of 5.

Cheezy. Bizarre. Poor writing. A paycheck movie for De Niro and Rourke. 1 1/2 stars for their performances (mainly Mickey's).

May 30, 2012
  • lilithdorsey rated this: 3.5 stars out of 5.

This movie whilst entertiaining and exciting to watch has little to do with the real world of voodoo.

May 05, 2012
  • aaa5756 rated this: 2 stars out of 5.

This movie was entertaining and interesting but not one of my favorite for this year. “Not too bad---good performance”. "I fast forwarded a lot but not all the way.”

May 18, 2011
  • Latrice_Burks rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

I beg to differ I love this movie! Mickey Rouke is a stud and a great actor! :)

Apr 07, 2011
  • golfprofrank rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

This is a slow, draggy movie, which near the end gets really sick, gross, I turned it off before it finished. Not a good movie.


Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add a Notice

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Find it at CLEVNET