[]
[]

Eyes Wide Shut

(DVD - 2007)
Average Rating: 3 stars out of 5.
Eyes Wide Shut
Print
A wife's admission of unfulfilled sexual longings plunges Dr. William Harford, a New Yorker, into an erotic odyssey that could destroy his marriage and ensnare him in a lurid murder mystery.
Publisher: Burbank, CA : Warner Home Video, 2007.
Edition: Two-disc special ed.
ISBN: 1419866443
Characteristics: 2 videodiscs (159 min.) :,sd., col. ;,4 3/4 in.
Alternate Title: Kubrick's eyes wide shut

Opinion

Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

This could have been a much better film with a different soundtrack. The monotony of the one-note piano is distracting and creates the wrong atmosphere for depicting an altered state. Imagine this film with a more evocative, dream-like score and sound design. Not great perhaps, but much more accessible.

Nov 09, 2013
  • Kage420 rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

TERRIBLE! I did not realize the F-word could be used as a verb,noun,adverb etc... Why was this movie even made?? It wasn't too long after this was made that Cruise and Kidman seperated was it? DO NOT WATCH! You have been warned.

Oct 30, 2013
  • crepka rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

One of my favorite movies of all time, if not my absolute favorite! If you are looking for a simple plot and lots of action, this isn't your movie. If you want a psychological thriller, this movie is for you.

The sets, the music, the lighting, and the actors themselves all made this movie have a unique "mood" the entire way throughout.

Jul 12, 2013
  • karmafarmer rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

Good analysis "Xaipe", appropriately named "comment", this feature of our library system, because it's incomprehensible to me how someone can review material by fast-fowarding through it.

Jul 08, 2013
  • SecretUnicorn rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

If you like phylosophical movies, then that's one of those. The underlyling theme is problem of fidelity between spouses. It's a slow paced film and can be quite boring for someone looking for action.

Mar 19, 2013
  • sdelao rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

A GREAT film!

Jan 22, 2013
  • xaipe rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

I saw the unexpurgated version of this movie without the hypocritical digital figleafs which would probably have driven Kubrick to an even earlier grave. The film has a nightmarish quality as the Tom Cruise character wanders through an erotic, pseudo-pornographic Disneyland as a curiously passive observer. For me, the whole point of the film was to illustrate the deadness and joylessness of pornography. Our media is saturated with all aspects of sex presented as just another commodity in our profoundly commodified culture. The negative responses of other library members to this movie illustrates the essential boredom and moral hypocrisy of the revels portrayed on the screen.

This movie was such a disappointment , boring , unwatchable and just plain terrible and horrible more like horrendous so wish I never watched it. Don't believe the hype there is no sex of any sort and the plot is just plain stupid. No idea what the entertainment industry was going on and on about. It doesn't even deserve a star.

Jan 21, 2013
  • mrsgail5756 rated this: 1 stars out of 5.

This movie was terrible. Dumb, Boring and Stupid Waste of time - Waste of Electrical power.
It would be a waste of money to buy. On watchable best describes this movie. I fast forwarded all the way.

Jan 21, 2013
  • tori7435 rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen!

View All Comments

Summary

Add a Summary

Jan 21, 2013
  • mrsgail5756 rated this: 1 stars out of 5.

On watchable best describes this movie.

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Notices

Add a Notice

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Find it at CLEVNET

  Loading...

Powered by BiblioCommons.
app10 Version gurli Last updated 2014/12/09 10:52